October 29, 2010

The renewed marketing jive: "customer"


"You got to be kidding" was my first idea this morning. Belgacom, Belgium's biggest telecom provider (the ex-monopolist) is said to 'bow for the customer'. A big leap, I would say, as they leapfrog from 'customer disinterest' to 'customer curtsy' (Belgacom IS a lady), skipping the phase of customer centricity.
However, big disappointment, as Belgacom in their press contacts -or the media in their sensation craving- have created a headline that has nothing to do with customer thinking whatsoever: the big idea is to 'improve' the quality of complaint management. Meaning that the telephonic helpdesk will be 'open' till 10 PM 7/7 and if the technician needs to come by, you don't need to take the day off, as they will be working during the evenings also.

Big misunderstanding.
This is an example of what I call 'termabuse'. Using 'customer oriented' as descriptor for these changes is the same as laughing your customers into the face. Customers that are customer centric DO NOT have massive complaints. Managing complaints is one thing, but putting it under the umbrella of customer thinking is several bridges too far. To be clear: there is always something ready to go wrong in your product, service, delivery or use. Nothing's perfect. And that is OK. But customer centric brands get credits from their customer when things go wrong. Because they can go wrong and they have noticed that when they do go wrong, the brand is helpfull and stays customer centric. Non-customer-centric brands or companies are not helpfull. Not before and not after the moment things go wrong. 
Customer centricity is adapting your system to reduce complaints, not changing your system to cope with the increasing amount of complaints.

Big stress.
That will be the result. Big stress. For the 'agents' manning the Belgacom call center. They will have to work longer, work harder and work more days. Complaints will be more fierce and more frequent; Belgacom just gave the customers the permission to be unhappy and to complain. They've just admitted that things are going wrong and that the only thing they will do about it is foresee more resources to handle the complaints.

1 minute.
The same day that Belgacom announced their 'fundamental' changes, my colleague received a letter from another 'ex-'monopolist Electrabel. The letter stated that Electrabel wants to be more customer centric. Therefore they have improved their ... yes: call-center. All calls will be handled within 1 minute. Poor call center agents. Because call centers are evaluated on the time they need to handle your problem,  not  necessarily on the quality of the solution they provide. 

But finally, what are you interested in? To have a good product and service to start with. To have a brand that offers relevance and gives you recognition as a customer. And if things would happen to go wrong, you 'just' want a decent solution. Not more people to handle the complaint but more people to create relevance in the first place.

That would be a good start for customer centricity...

October 26, 2010

Jump the technology evolution


People in general and marketers in specific tend to think that 'evolution' is a progressive process without jumps.
True. 
But that doesn't mean that nature never jumps forward and neither does marketing and business. As soon as you introduce an advanced element that fits an environment that was closed before, you can create a jump forward.
Compare it to Australia that meandered through its existence untill some fools introduced rabbits.
Anyway, the BRIC-countries can be considered as former 'closed' markets by their political system or their economic arrears. However, the techno-economic parity that we're living in today, grants full access to these areas to techno-jump over the 'western' heads.
SPICE MOBILITY is one of these techno-jumpers. This Indian telecom-player states on their site: "With "Innovation" as the company’s mantra, Spice began the process of revolutionizing the Communication & Entertainment sector, with its new age technologically advanced state of the art mobile phones." 
Not only are they speaking of a 'mantra', putting their brand's spiritual dimension (cf. 4-D Branding) way ahead of the old approach, they're also actually doing it. Spice recently introduced the first 3D cell phone without 3D specs: "M-67 3D is bestowed with Auto-stereoscopic Display, which facilitate users to view three-dimensional images, enabling objects to appear more real & physical. The dedicated 3D shortcut key on the phone key lets users to switch amid 2D and 3D mode instantly. Further, the phone supports parallel version of 3D Image and Video format for that perfect viewing." And all that for under $100.
Wow.
Or what about the multi-SIM M-4580 that has enough battery to stay stand-by for 25 days. In short, while Europe is still fancying androïd apps and games (over 100.000 androïd apps since yesterday), India is winning the race. Best proof: Spice foresees 8 A&M's in the upcoming period...
I want more Spice in our market...

October 18, 2010

The GAP Story: 7 days to quickly forget.




DAY 0
October 4, 2010
GAP introduces its new logo on its site. No fuss, no fanfare, no event, just done.
Down With Design Blog reports the new logo is no good: “I really can’t understand the thinking behind this move.” In no time designers express their discontent on the bad design. Some even offer GAP a free redesign of their logo.

October 6, 2010
Kitsune Noir Blog reports: “There was a lot of brand equity in that big blue square and they didn’t move far away enough from the source for this logo to even begin to feel new or exciting.” Twitter explodes and someone (is it GAP?) starts a Twitter to defend the change: http://twitter.com/GapLogo. Gap gets a ro and contra Twitter. The internet community starts talking about Gapocalypse.

October 7, 2010
The logo gets the official name of ‘monstrosity’. GAP states/pretends the new logo is just a way to create buzz for their crowdsourcing project to find a new logo. Their Facebook page says:
“We know this logo created a lot of buzz and we’re thrilled to see passionate debates unfolding! So much so we’re asking you to share your designs. We love our version, but we’d like to... see other ideas. Stay tuned for details in the next few days on this crowd sourcing project.”
GAP is crowdsourcing for a new logo? No way. It’s just a bad PR recovery attempt the online community reacts. Since they want the world to create their new logo, where is the design brief?
Only the Time-NewsFeed seems to like the new logo. “NewsFeed personally does not mind Helvetica, and so this new logo brings to mind visions of a streamlined, technologically dominant future America where everyone wears white suits and cool glasses. Sure, it's generic, but don't you know that in the future everything looks alike?"

October 8, 2010
It takes GAP 2 days to react. Marka Hansen, President of GAP North America reacts in a column in the Huffington Post.
She states: “Our brand and our clothes are changing and rethinking our logo is part of aligning with that. We want our customers to take notice of Gap and see what it stands for today. We chose this design as it's more contemporary and current. It honors our heritage through the blue box while still taking it forward.”
She invites everyone to go into the dialogue and through their Facebook page people can send new proposals. How can she be defending a bad logo and at the same time invite people to make other proposals? One of the reactions says: “it (the logo) looks like something from a corporate powerpoint presentation”.

October 11, 2010
The GAP Facebook page end the story:
“Ok. We’ve heard loud and clear that you don’t like the new logo. We’ve learned a lot from the feedback. We only want what’s best for the brand and our customers. So instead of crowd sourcing, we’re bringing back the Blue Box tonight. “
Bye bye new logo, bye bye crowdsourcing, helo old logo.

Marka Hansen’s full statement:
"Since we rolled out an updated version of our logo last week on our website, we’ve seen an outpouring of comments from customers and the online community in support of the iconic blue box logo.
Last week, we moved to address the feedback and began exploring how we could tap into all of the passion. Ultimately, we’ve learned just how much energy there is around our brand. All roads were leading us back to the blue box, so we’ve made the decision not to use the new logo on gap.com any further.
At Gap brand, our customers have always come first. We’ve been listening to and watching all of the comments this past week. We heard them say over and over again they are passionate about our blue box logo, and they want it back. So we’ve made the decision to do just that – we will bring it back across all channels.
In the meantime, the website will go back to our iconic blue box logo and, for Holiday, we’ll turn our blue box red for our seasonal campaign.
We’ve learned a lot in this process. And we are clear that we did not go about this in the right way. We recognize that we missed the opportunity to engage with the online community.  This wasn’t the right project at the right time for crowd sourcing.
There may be a time to evolve our logo, but if and when that time comes, we’ll handle it in a different way."

Hell yea... I hope so.
 
DAY 7 - the new logo on the site is the old one.

PS: For the occasion the blog is posted in Helvetica ;-)